ABHISHEK RAJ ALIAS ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9425/2026 · 2026-10-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:30178 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9425 of 2026
------ Abhishek Raj @ Abhishek Srivastava, aged about 36 years, son of Surendra Kumar Srivastava, Resident of H. No.41, Goushala Road, Near Kali Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Jugsalai, Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 08-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 42 of 2026 instituted under Section 25 (1-B) (a), 25(6), 26 & 35 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in organized crime syndicate and led to recovery of 03 pistols loaded with cartridge. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 01.06.2026, as mentioned in para-14 of this bail application. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 10.08.2026 in B.A. No.7451 of 2026. It is lastly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court
below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 42 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/10/2026 Abhiraj/