Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28500 (CAL)

SATYAKI MANDAL ALIAS SWARTHAKI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/681/2026 · 2026-07-15

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L – 557 15/07/2026 Court No.29 S.Kundu CRR 681 of 2026 With CRAN 1 of 2026 Satyaki Mandal @ Swarthaki Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Koushik Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arijit Bhusan …for the petitioner. In Re: CRAN 1 of 2026 1. Delay in filing the application is condoned. 2. Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of. In Re: CRR 681 of 2026 3. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 25.09.2024 by which the Court below issued the warrant of arrest against the petitioner. 4. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Court below failed to consider that before issuing the warrant of arrest, the Court must form an opinion as to whether a summon will suffice in securing the appearance of the accused before the Court. If yes, then the summon or the bailable warrant should be preferred. He further submits that the warrant either 2 bailable or non-bailable should never be issued without scrutiny of facts. However, the learned Trial Court in the present case without properly exercising his judicial discretion has mechanically passed the impugned order, which is bad in law and not sustainable. 5. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on instruction submits that he may be given liberty to surrender before the Court below. 6. Having considered that the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is found to be innocuous, the same is allowed. 7. In view of the above, the instant application being CRR 681 of 2026 is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below within a period of three weeks and in the event of such surrender by the petitioner before the Court below, he shall dispose of such prayer in accordance with law. 8. The impugned order dated 25.09.2024 passed in POCSO 25 of 2024 by which the warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner shall remain stayed for a period of three weeks or till the petitioner surrenders before the Court below whichever is earlier. 9. Accordingly, CRR 681 of 2026 stands disposed of. 3 10. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)