- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18578 WP No. 11162 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 11162 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MRS. AMREEN BEGUM W/O. SHAHNAWAZ KHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/A T-107, 4TH FLOOR, PROPERTY NO.9 PARK ROAD TASKER TOWN BANGALORE-560 051 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HITESH GOWDA B.J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP UNDER SECRETARY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE SPECIAL OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR –I.M.A. GROUP OF COMPANIES/ REGIONAL COMMISSIONER (REV) BENGALURU DIVISION, BENGALURU 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, VV TOWERS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 REP. SPECIAL OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18578 WP No. 11162 of 2022 3. I MONETARY ADVISORY A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MOHAMED MANSOOR KHAN NO.56/4,D, 1ST FLOOR, NANDI BUILDING HOSPITAL ROAD SHIVAJI NAGAR BENGALURU-560 001 4. MOHAMMED MANSOOR KHAN S/O ABID ALI KHAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.9, PENT HOUSE, BYTHAL MARIYAM APARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, PARK ROAD TASKER TOWN BEGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED: 28.03.2022 WITH NO. SPLOCA/IMA/SPLC(S-5) /39/2021 FOR BUILDING BEARING OLD NO.09 AND 9/1, PID NO.78-56-9 AND 78-56-9/1, PARK ROAD, TASKER TOWN, CIVIL STATION, WARD NO.63, BENGALURU TO THE EXTENT OF THE PETITIONERS ATTACHED PROPERTY VIDE ANNEXURE-A OF THE R-2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18578 WP No. 11162 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The writ petition is of the year 2022. When the matter came up before this Court on 01.04.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 02.04.2026. Even on 02.04.2026 also there was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55