Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28498 (AP)

SEEKOTI APPA RAO v. THE REGISTRAR (ADMN) HIGH COURT OF AP., and 2 OTHERS

WP/38458/2012 · 2026-02-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010772782012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 38458/2012 Between: 1. SEEKOTI APPA RAO,, OCC: COMPULSARLY RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O D. NO 11-4-129, RADHALAPETA, PITHAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGISTRAR ADMN HIGH COURT OF AP AND 2 OTHERS, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGH COURT HYDERABAD 2. THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CUM DISTRICT JUDGE, RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE ENQUIRY OFFICER CUM SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing to produce records and to delcare the orders in D(D)A. No 01/2012 C.4(Con.) dated 12.04.2012 issued by the 1st Respondent and File No 71 of 2005 and File No 84 of 2008 dated 17.01.2011, thereby conforming the orders of the 2nd Respondent bad in law, and illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provision of A.P.C.S. (CCA) Rules 1991 and may pass such order or 2 orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 48783 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner as Record Assistant under the control of the Junior Civil Judge: Razole, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumsatances of the case. IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 211631 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BS KARTIK & PRASAD ESR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC) 2. P S P SURESH KUMAR 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) There was no appearance on 19.01.2026, and the matter was posted for dismissal today. There is no appearance for the petitioner today also. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.02.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 38458/2012 Date: 02.02.2026 KA