T. SHASHA PEERA, ANANTAPUR DIST., & 2 OTRS. v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.,REP.BY PRL.SECRETARY, LAW, HYD., & 3 OTRS.
WP/8473/2013 · 2026-01-18
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010781242013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8473/2013 Between:
1. T. SHASHA PEERA, ANANTAPUR DIST., & 2 OTRS., OCC: TYPIST- CUM-ASSISTANT, VI ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE'S COURT (FTC), ANANTAPUR AT GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. I.SAILAJA, W/O BHASKAR,, OCC: TYPIST-CUM-ASSISTANT, IV FAST TRACK COURT, ANANTAPUR. 3. K.RAVI PRASAD, S/O K.KULLAYAPPA, OCC: STENO-TYPIST, VI ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE'S COURT (FTC), ANANTAPUR AT GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE GOVT OF A P REP BY PRL SECRETARY LAW HYD 3 OTRS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. THE HIGH COURT OF A P, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DISTRICT JUDGE, ANANTHAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more partiality one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to absorb the petitioners into regular vacancies and regularize their services in their respective posts from the dates of their initial appointment and pay them regular pay scales attached to the said posts IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 10562 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in their respective posts pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A JAYANTHI
2. GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
3
The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 19.01.2026 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 8473/2013 Date: 19.01.2026 KA