15.07.2026 Serial no. 17 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 1013 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with N 222 of 2025 arising out of Swarupnagar PS Case No. 472 of 2025 dated 11.07.2025 u/s 20(b)(ii)(c)/21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act and Sections 126(2)/132/117(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Asadulla Mallick @ Ashadulla Mallick @ Ashadulla … Petitioner(s) Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S. S. Saha … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, ld. APP Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case for alleged recovery of 20.390 kg of ganja and 100 bottles of phensedyl from the joint possession of the petitioner and another. Learned advocate also submits that the petitioner is in custody for about a year; one witness has been examined till date and there is no possibility of the trial being concluded in the near future. As such, learned advocate prays that the petitioner may be released on bail. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, learned APP, appears for the State along with a junior of his choice as per the direction of this court. The appointment of both Mr. Das and the junior of his choice, if any, be regularized by the concerned 2 authority. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is already an accused in connection with Swarupnagar PS Case No. 719 of 2024. Having considered that the petitioner has previous antecedent, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. The petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses is over. Let the evidence of the seizure list witnesses be completed within a period of three months from date of communication of this order. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1013 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3