1 CGHC010260262026 2026:CGHC:31483 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.Cr.C(A) No.1144 of 2026 Satish Dahariya Son Of Late Shri Bhulauram Dahariya, Aged About 31 Years Resident Of Jarhabhata, Mini Basti, Police Station Civil Line, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order On Board 23.07.2026 1. The Applicant has preferred this 2nd anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.07.23 18:20:45 +0530 2 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of Anticipatory Bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.1360/2025, registered at Police Station – Civil Line, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 221, 132, 296, 351(2) and 299 of BNS. Earlier application was rejected on merits vide order dated 04.05.2026 passed in M.Cr.C(A) No.665/2026. 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 15.11.2025, when Ashutosh Chaitanya, an accused in Crime No.645/2025 registered at Police Station Takhatpur, was produced before the Court at Bilaspur for remand, a large number of persons assembled in the court premises. It is alleged that the present Applicants, along with others, unlawfully entered the court premises, abused and threatened the accused with dire consequences and attempted to assault him. It is further alleged that despite the deployment of more than 100 police personnel to control the situation, the Applicants and others pushed and obstructed the police personnel, thereby preventing public servants from discharging their official duties. Accordingly, the present crime came to be registered against the present Applicant under the offences as mentioned above. Hence this application. 3 3. None appears for the Applicant nor is any representation made on his behalf when the case is called out for hearing. 4. Learned State Counsel opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that this is the second application for anticipatory bail, the earlier application has already been rejected on merits and there is no change in the circumstances warranting reconsideration of the Applicant's prayer, therefore, this application may be rejected. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the State and perused the material available in the case diary. 6. This being the second application for anticipatory bail and the earlier application having already been rejected on merits, no ground is made out to reconsider the matter. 7. Accordingly, the present repeat Anticipatory Bail application of the Applicant –Satish Dahariya, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Crime No.1360/2025, registered at Police Station – Civil Line, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 221, 132, 296, 351(2) and 299 of BNS, is hereby rejected. 4 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Priya