K.TEJOVATHI, CHITTOOR DIST. v. DM. MAMATHA, CHITTOOR DIST.
CC/2132/2017 · 2026-02-18
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28486 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28486 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010897612017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2132/2017 Between:
1. K.TEJOVATHI, CHITTOOR DIST., W/O PHILIPS CHAKRAVARTHY AGED 60 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT (RETD.,) SRI PADMAVATHI MAHILA VISWAVIDYALAYAM, TIRUPATI, R/O TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. DM MAMATHA CHITTOOR DIST, Registrar, Sri Padmavathi Mahila Viswavidyalayam Tirupati, Chittoor District
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to be pleased to punish the Respondent herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for her intentional, willful and deliberate disobedience of the interim order dt.20.06.2017 in WPMP
2
MRK,J
C.C.NO.2132 OF 2017 No.24282 of 2017 in WPNo.19868 of 2017 passed by the Hon'ble Sri Justice MS RAMACHANDRA RAO and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 953 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2017(APPL 954 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. MANIKYA VEENA M (SC FOR PADMAVATHI MAHILA UNIVERSITY) The Court made the following:
3
MRK,J
C.C.NO.2132 OF 2017 ORDER:-
The contempt petition has been filed for non- implementation of orders dated 20.06.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.24282 of 2017 in W.P.No.19868 of 2017. 2. No representation in the revised call also. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. M Manikya Veena, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, submitted that after filing the present Contempt Case, the orders dated 20.06.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.24282 of 2017 in W.P.No.19868 of 2017, have been complied with and the petitioner services were extended from 58 years to 60 years and after extension, the petitioner was retired from services on 30.06.2017 and to substantiate the above submission, she placed a copy of proceedings dated 30.06.2017 issued by the Registrar of Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 19.02.2026 LSP