Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28481 (AP)

T.Ganganna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37674/2018 · 2026-02-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010772372018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37674/2018 Between: 1. T.GANGANNA, S/O T.BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIES, R/O ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. VANNURSAB, S/O BADINEHAL DAZTAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIES, R/O ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. TAMASH, S/O ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIES, R/O ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. MABUSAB, S/O KALA HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIES, R/O ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SMT. LAKSHMI, W/O GOLLA NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIES, R/O ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETATY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 2 JS, J W.P.No.37674/2018 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. ISVI GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP, BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, ISVI VILLAGE ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent authorities in conducting enquiry with regard to the irregularities committed in the process of issuance of house site pattas issued in the land in Sy,No. 210/2, 4, 5 and 6 of Isvi village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District, and taking steps to cancel the same, inspite of the written representation dt. 24-9- 2018 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent authorities to cancel the house pattas issued to the ineligible persons pursuant to the list of beneficiaries and to conduct through enquiry and prepare a fresh list of the beneficiaries with eligible candidates, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent authorities to consider and take immediate action pursuant to the representation dt. 24-9-2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.37674/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.M.Karthi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.37674/2018 23 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37674/2018 Date: 11.02.2026 rsd