RAMESH CHAND GURJAR SON OF CHANDA RAM, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN,
CRLMP/6951/2025 · 2026-04-22
Uma Shanker Vyas
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17124] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6951/2025 Ramesh Chand Gurjar Son Of Chanda Ram, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Kothala Ki Dhani Bajrangpura, Viratnagar Bhabru, Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Kotputli- Behror. 3. Shri Gyarsilal (Investigation Officer), Police Station Bhabru, District Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avi Airun, Adv. for Mr. Jitendra Mitrucka, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 22/04/2026 ;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k x;k fd orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ;kph] ifjoknh gS rFkk iqfyl }kjk bl ekeys esa fu"i{k vuqla/kku ugha fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% mfpr funsZ'k iznku fd;k tkosA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&ifjoknh rFkk fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dh cgl lquh x;h] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n`"Vkar Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. AIR 2008 SC 907 ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd fu"i{k vuqla/kku dks lqfuf'pr djus gsrq lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; vuqla/kku dks eksfuVj djus o vko';d funsZ'k nsus gsrq l{ke gS rFkk ,sls ekeyksa esa lkekU; :i ls /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l-@482 n.M
[2026:RJ-JP:17124] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6951/2025] izfdz;k lafgrk dh 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gS rFkk ,slh izo`fRr fu:Rlkfgr gksus ;ksX; gSA bl fu.kZ; ds iSjk la[;k 15 o 25 lqlaxr gSa tks fuEukuqlkj gS&
"15. Section 156(3) provides for a check by the Magistrate on the police performing its duties under Chapter XII Cr.P.C. In cases where the Magistrate finds that the police has not done its duty of investigating the case at all, or has not done it satisfactorily, he can issue a direction to the police to do the investigation properly, and can monitor the same. 25.
We have elaborated on the above matter because we often find that when someone has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered at the police station and/or a proper investigation is not being done by the police, he rushes to the High Court to file a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. We are of the opinion that the High Court should not encourage this practice and should ordinarily refuse to interfere in such matters, and relegate the petitioner to his alternating remedy, firstly under Section 154(3) and Section 36 Cr.P.C. before the concerned police officers, and if that is of no avail, by approaching the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3)." mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk vkfn dks ns[krs gq, bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gS] vr% ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk lkFk gh ;kph&ifjoknh dks ;g Lora=rk iznku dh tkrh gS fd og viuh O;Fkk ds laca/k esa lacaf/kr eftLVªsV@U;k;ky; ds le{k viuk i{k j[kus gsrq Lora= gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /62