KATAR SINGH v. RAVINDRA KUMAR KHANDELWAL AND OTHERS
LPA/1814/2026 · 2026-07-08
Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-1814-2026 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 LPA-1814-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :08.07.2026 KATAR SINGH ...Appellant
Versus RAVINDRA KUMAR KHANDELWAL AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate for the appellant. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CM-6783-CWP- 2026 in CWP No. 11292 of 2026 vide which, the impleadment application filed by the appellant has been dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 25,000/- without consideration of subtantial facts and laws involved.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the only endeavour before the learned Single Judge was to bring certain facts to the notice of the Court as a citizen of the country and nothing more. However, while dismissing the CM-6783-CWP-2026 in CWP No. 11292 of 2026, vide
order dated 05.05.2026, the learned Single Judge imposed costs of Rs.25,000/- upon the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with a prayer that the costs so imposed upon the appellant be waived off.
3. Keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances, RIYA 2026.07.10 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
LPA-1814-2026 (O&M) -2- though the appellant exceeded the permissible limits in invoking the jurisdiction of the Court in a cause in which he cannot raise any grievance, but it appears that his intention was only to bring certain facts to the notice of the Court. Therefore, in the interest of justice, as prayed for the present appeal is disposed of having been not pressed any further and the cost of Rs.25,000/- imposed upon the appellant vide order dated 05.05.2026 is waived off.
4. The present appeal is disposed of in above terms.
5. Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE July 08, 2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable : No RIYA 2026.07.10 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document