1 CGHC010268102026 2026:CGHC:31162-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1818 of 2026 1 - A B C (The Name And Details Are In The Closed Envelop) 2 - Devendra Tandon S/o Ghasi Ram Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Singhitarai, Tashil Dabhara, District- Sakti --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Dabhara, District- Sakti (C.G.) 2 - Lal Kumar Dansena S/o Natthu Ram Dansena Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Singhitarai, Tahsil Dabhara, District- Sakti (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 1851 of 2026 1 - A B C (The Name And Details Are In The Closed Envelop) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Dabhara, District- Sakti (C.G.) 2 - X Y Z (The Name And Details Are In The Closed Envelop) --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Shri Ramsajiwan and Shri Ishwar Jaiswal, Advocates. For State : Ms. Anusha Nayak, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 22.07.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1. Since common facts and issues are involved in both these petitions, they are being heard and decided together by this common order. INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.07.23 10:46:17 +0530 2 2. The prayer made by the petitioners in these petitions are, for quashing of FIR bearing Crime No.75 of 2026, dated 06.03.2026 and Crime No. 36 of 2026, dated 28.01.2026, respectively, registered against the petitioners at Police Station, Dabhra, District Sakti. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners in CrMP No.1818 of 2026 would submit that the complainant/father of minor juvenile, on 06.03.2026 made a written complaint that the petitioners herein have demanded rupees ten Lakhs from him or else his son (juvenile) would be implicated in a rape case leading to lodge an FIR being Crime No.75 of 2026 against the petitioners for the offence under Section 308(2) read with Section 3(5) of BNS, whereas, the submission of counsel for petitioner in CrMP No.1851 of 2026 is that, on the pretext of marriage, the minor petitioner alleged to have committed sexual intercourse upon the victim leading to file an FIR on 28.01.2026 being Crime No.36/2026 at the same police station i.e. Police Station Dabhra for the offence under Section 69 of BNS and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short, The ST & SC Act). 4. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the counsel appearing for the parties that the both the parties i.e. victim, accused and complainant have entered into compromise and amicably settled their disputes and further the petitioner No.1/victim got married with another person and she does not want to prosecute the son of complainant any further. Therefore, both the FIRs may be quashed in the interest of justice. 3 5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the record, including the pleadings, the reliefs sought and the documents placed on record. 6. Considering the fact that the matter is still under investigation and FIRs have been lodged against each other and further since compromise/settlement is alleged to have been entered into between the parties, but no document in this regard showing settlement/compromise has been filed by them before this court, both the petitions stand dismissed. However, the parties are at liberty to produce such document, if any, before the Investigating Officer of the case. If such document is filed, the Investigating Officer shall verify the genuineness, voluntariness and authenticity of the compromise entered into between the parties and shall thereafter submit a detailed report before the competent Court 7. With the aforementioned observations and directions, these writ petitions are dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder