Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28472 (MAD)

Venkatesan v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL MP/8807/2026 · 2026-06-02

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.8859 of 2026 Venkatesan S /o Palanivappan, D No.8/1-206, Subramaniyanagar, Pudhusampalli, Mettur, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Karumalaikudal Police Station, Salem District. Cr.No.109 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to modify the condition imposed in Para No.7 (c) “...” in Crl.O.P.No. 8859 of 2026 dated 08.04.2026 on the file of this Honble High Court For Petitioner(s): M/S. C.Deepakkumar For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking modification of the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Paragraph 7(c) in Crl.OP.No. 8859 of 2026 dated 08.04.2026 that “the petitioner is directed to deposit a non-refundable sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) through Demand Draft in favour of the “ The Head Master, Pudusampalli, Government Higher Secondary School, Pudusampalli, Mettur Taluk, Salem District” The Demand Draft shall be handed over to the Assistant Educational Officer, Salem District”. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has resigned his post as a counselor and he is having difficulty to mobilize the money and unable to comply the conditional order imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for modification of the said condition. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the Petitioner has unable to comply the conditional order of this Court. Hence, he opposed to allow this petition. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records. 5. Considering the nature of offence and the way in which behaved and the seriousness of the allegations, this Court does not find any reason to modify the condition. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. 02-06-2026 Vv To 1. The Inspector of Police, Karumalaikudal Police Station, Salem District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VV CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.8859 of 2026 02-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 8807 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis