Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28466 (PNJ)

JAGANJOT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/36577/2026 · 2026-07-09

Shalini Singh Nagpal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-36577 129 Jaganjot Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. 1. directing official respondents to and to take action on manner. 2. respondent No.5 his position and Rs.2 lacs on false pretext of procuring No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriate money. When petitioner extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed representation was made to limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. 3. 36577-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jaganjot Singh VERSUS State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Ajaypal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 528 of BNSS official respondents to register FIR take action on representation dated Learned counsel for the petitioner respondent No.5, who was a journalist working with Da his position and fraudulently induced the petitioner on false pretext of procuring official No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriate . When petitioner confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed representation was made to respondent No.3 but no action was taken. limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. Notice of motion to official respon 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36577-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Petitioner Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for register FIR against the private respondent dated 27.04.2026 in a time bound the petitioners submits that private who was a journalist working with Dainik Savera misused induced the petitioner to handover a sum of official police security. Respondent No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriated the confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed respondent No.3 but no action was taken. The limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. Notice of motion to official respondents. M) .2026 Petitioner Respondents has been filed for against the private respondent in a time bound private vera misused sum of ndent the confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed The KAPIL 2026.07.10 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-36577 4. accepts notice on behalf Hardeep Singh, respondents was received 5. respondent No. representation within a period of speaking order 6. 09.07.2026 Kapil 36577-2026 (O&M) Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents Hardeep Singh, he submits that petitioner’s representation against the private was received and the same was pending. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3- Commissioner of Police, representation dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P within a period of one month from today speaking order, as per law and take necessary action, if so required. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : 2 Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, of the official respondents. On instructions from HC representation against the private and the same was pending. disposed of with a direction to Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana, to decide (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner from today, by passing a reasoned and and take necessary action, if so required. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Yes/No who is present in Court, n instructions from HC representation against the private disposed of with a direction to de the petitioner by passing a reasoned and (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.10 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document