Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28465 (AP)

CHAMARTHI MADHUSUDHANA RAJU v. VIMALA TRADERS AND ANOTHER REP BY PP

CRLRC/2867/2017 · 2026-02-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010859882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2867/2017 Between: 1. CHAMARTHI MADHUSUDHANA RAJU, S/O CHANGALA RAJU, PROPRIETOR, RAVANTH ENTERPRISES SCION FOODS PRIVATE LTD, FLAT NO. 204,305, RELIANCE RESIDENCY, OPP: NTR STADIUM DOMALAGUDA, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VIMALA TRADERS AND ANOTHER REP BY PP, S/O NAGAPPA, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 15-11-2015 WEAKER SECTION COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 401 BALAJI TOWERS, KURNOOL-4. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PP, PP AT HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision case by setting aside the docket order passed in Crl.M.P.No.780/2017 in C.C.No.697 of 2016 Dt.26-9-2017 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kurnool, And to grant such other order. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4675 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of the appearance of the accused including the execution of the NBW issued o 20-3-2017 in C.C.No. 697/2016 on the file of the Judicial first Class Magistrate, Kurnool, pending disposal of the Criminal Case, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P N NALINI KANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2867 OF 2017 ORDER: None appeared for the revision petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.1/complainant. 2. Sri C.Panini Somayaji, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State/R2 would submit that upon verification of the information in CIS relating to C.C.No.697 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Kurnool would disclose that the case was disposed of on 21.05.2018. He further submitted that the present revision case is filed challenging the docket order in Crl.M.P.No.780 of 2017 in C.C.No.697 of 2016, dated 26.09.2017, whereunder the learned trial Court refused to recall the warrant, but now, as the case itself is disposed of and the criminal revision case become infructuous. 3. In the light of the above submissions, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 09.02.2026 Dmr 4 94 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2867 OF 2017 Date: 09.02.2026 Dmr