Court No. 6 (265719) 16.07.2026 (A 691) (S. Banerjee) CO 377 of 2026 Sri Kaushik Nanda & Anr. Vs. Sri Kountik Nanda & Ors. Mr. Ghosh Mr. Kalipada Chakraborty …for the petitioners This matter was mentioned by Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners at the first sitting of the Court. Considering the urgency pleaded, this matter was directed to be taken up at 1 p.m. Mr. Ghosh submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the portion of the order allowing the application under Order 22 Rule 10 of the Code. Mr. Ghosh submits that through inadvertence this Civil Revision application has been filed challenging the order allowing the application under Order 22 Rule 10. He prays for leave to withdraw this civil revision application with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, CO 377 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with 2 liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner is permitted to take back the certified copy of the order impugned by replacing the same with a photostat copy thereof. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)