Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28454 (PNJ)

RAJWINDER KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/7914/2026 · 2026-07-09

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRWP-7914-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 118 CRWP-7914-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 RAJWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Yajur Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and further seeking direction to consider and decide the representation dated 28.06.2026 (Annexure P-3). 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to the respondent No. 4- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural, Punjab to consider and decide representation dated 29.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.09 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRWP-7914-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural, Punjab, to decide the aforesaid representation dated 29.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by petitioner within a period of one month from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.4 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 09.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.09 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document