( 2026:JHHC:30315 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2998 of 2026 ------ Manoj Kumar Mahto @ Manoj Kumar, aged about 38 years, son of Mangar Mahto @ Mangru Mahto, resident of Village- Gondalpura, P.O.-Badam, P.S.-Barkagaon, Dist.-Hazaribagh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 09.10.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order of filing supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that as the certified copies of the latest order sheet could not be submitted on time hence, the said supplementary affidavit could not be filed within the stipulated time and the same resulted in dismissal of B.A. No. 5496 of 2026. It is further submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 and unless B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List B.A. No. 5496 of 2026 under the appropriate heading before the appropriate bench after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09.10.2026 Gunjan-