APHC010807642018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39090/2018 Between: 1. KUCHARLAPATI RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU,, S/O RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURE, R/O THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVELLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTNEMT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE AMALAPURAM REVNUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AMALAPRUAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KOTTALA SURENDRANATH, S/O VEERI MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. GEDDAM SATYANARAYANA, S/O VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. MADDELA SATYANARAYANA SASTRY, S/O DAMODHRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI 2 VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. GIDLA SATYANARAYANA, S/O VASANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. GIDLA MALLESWARA RAO, S/O NARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. GIDLA SURYANARAYANASURESH, S/O VERRIYYA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. GIDLA SURESH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. MUTTABATHULA REDDY, S/O SAHADEVUDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 13. KORAPU MALLESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, THOTHARAMUDI VILLAGE, INAVILLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandmus declaring the action of the 2nd to 4th respondents in not taken steps for removal of obstructions in Sy. No. 87 an extent of Ac.0-82 cents, in Sy. No. 88 an extent of Ac.1-22 cents of Bandi Dhari of Tottaramudi Village, Inavilli Mandal, East Godavari District in purusance of under taken before the Mandal Legal Services Authority, Amalapuram, vide Ref.No.A/100/2018, dated 05-2018, as illegal, arbitrary, violations of principal of natural justice and also violation of fundamental Rights under Constitution of India and consequently direct the Official respondents to removal of obstructions in Sy. No. 87 an extent of Ac.0-82 cents, in Sy. No. 88 an extent of Ac.1-22 cents of Bandi Dhari of Tottaramudi Village, Inavilli Mandal, East Godavari District in purusance of under taken before the Mandal Legal Services Authority, Amalapuram, vide Ref.No.A/100/2018, dated 05-2018 and pass 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to immediately steps for removal of obstructions in Sy. No. 87 an extent of Ac.0- 82 cents, in Sy. No. 88 an extent of Ac.1-22 cents of Bandi Dhari of Tottaramudi Village, Inavilli Mandal, East Godavari District in purusance of under taken before the Mandal Legal Services Authority, Amalapuram, vide RefNo.A/100/2018, dated 05-2018 pending the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) on 23.02.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS 5 203 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39090/2018 Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS