Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28447 (PAT)

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./51986/2026 · 2026-07-29

Alok Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51986 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/O Rambabu Sah R/o Village- Shankar Saraiya Parsauna, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Asif Kalim, Adv. Mr. Md. Irfan Haque, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 29-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025 registered under Section 111, 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of B.N.S., pending in the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that while patrolling, the Police received confidential information that eight persons are transporting new scooties without numbered through boat across the river. When the Police reached there, 5 persons fled away with 4 scooties but 3 persons with 4 scooties were apprehended by the Police. It is further alleged that during the enquiry, the persons failed to submit any document. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51986 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has a clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The counsel further submits that the petitioners’ name was surfaced merely on the suspicion. 5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties and considering the fact that since the petitioner was not apprehended on the spot and his name was disclosed later on by the apprehended persons, I am inclined to grant the petitioner benefit of anticipatory bail. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025 registered under Section 111, 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of B.N.S. Anand/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T