APHC010783462013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15592/2013 Between: 1. P.SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O APPAYYA, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. QTR NO. UD/LD. 219, ' B' COLONY, DR N.T.T.P.S., IBRAHIMPATNAM ( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P GENCO REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUTSOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION, VIDYUTSOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER DR N T T P S, IBRAHIMPATNAM( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. G VENKATESWARA PRASAD, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O DIVISIONAL ENGINEER E.M & M.R.T, STAGE -I, DR N.T.T.P.S. IBRAHIMPATNAM( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. CH V SUBBA RAO, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, E.M & M.R.T, STAGE -III, DR N.T.T.P.S. IBRAHIMPATNAM ( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. B V RAMANA KUMAR, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O ACCOUNTS OFFICER, DR N.T.T.P.S, IBRAHIMPATNAM ( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. S DURGA RANI, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O DIVISIONAL ENGINEER 2 E.M & M.R.T, STAGE -III, DR N.T.T.P.S. IBRAHIMPATNAM( POST), KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus Declaring the impugned action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned MemoNo.CEE/O&M/DrNTTPS/Adm/C.1/F.4/D.No. 1091/13,Dt.18-5-2013 rejecting the request of the petitioner for revising the seniority and further treating the unofficial respondents as senior to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and voilative of article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India, apart from contrary to the A.P.S.E.B. Service regulations and violative of principles of Natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 18887 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased directing the respondents not to fill up the posts of senior assistants pending claim of the petitioner for rectification of seniority for which remarks were called for by the 1st respondent vide Memo No.JS(P)/DS(E)/AS(V&R)(NT)/PO- 1/303/2013 Dt.27-5-2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V SESHA KUMARI 2. K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 submits that the petitioner has sought revision of seniority and further sought to treat the unofficial respondents as seniors to the petitioner. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner was subsequently promoted, and as both the petitioner and the unofficial respondents have attained the age of superannuation, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on merits. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 25.02.2026 PNS