Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:2081-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
24TH MARCH, 2026
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 162 OF 2026
Dr. Balam Singh Dafauti.
…Petitioner Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner.
: Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondent no. 1. : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Counsel for respondent nos. 2 &
3. : Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel.
JUDGMENT : (per Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
1.
The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to consider his claim for regularization of his services as Assistant Professor in the respondent-University.
2.
The case of the petitioner is that he is presently posted as Assistant Professor (Academic Consultant) Computer Science, and has completed more than 15 years of continuous service. He was initially appointed on 06.07.2010, as Academic Consultant in Computer Science, on contractual basis, on a fixed salary of Rs. 14,000/- per month. It is stated that the University has recommended to the State 1
2026:UHC:2081-DB
Government for regularizing the services of such contractual teachers, and in support of the said submission, reliance has been placed on a letter dated 27.10.2020 by the then Vice Chancellor of the Uttarakhand Open University addressed to the Chief Minister.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, and other similarly situated teachers, have made repeated representations to the State Government, but to no avail, and hence the present Writ Petition.
4.
It is admitted that, so far, there is no Scheme or Rule for regularization of services of contractual employees in the respondent-University. Consequently, no direction, as prayed for, can be granted.
5.
However, we leave it open to the petitioner to approach the State Government, so that the State Government, on basis of the letter of the respondent- University, may consider the claim of the petitioner, and other identically situated faculty members of the respondent- University, for regularization/ grant of minimum pay-scale. We further provide that, in case any such representation is made to respondent no. 1, the same shall be considered by the Competent Authority within eight weeks from the date of 2
2026:UHC:2081-DB
communication of this
order, along with a fresh representation.
6.
The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
7.
All pending applications stand
disposed of accordingly.
______________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 24th March, 2026 Rahul 3
RAHUL PRAJAPATI Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3e 66e61bf4c848741983ed8c39e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8A 192FCAD15C390A1AAD7B39857D2540AE4C 28A4898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2026.03.24 18:28:01 +05'30'