RAMESH CHAND GUPTA S/O SHRI JAGDISH, v. NATHMAL DIDEL,
CCP/601/2023 · 2026-04-21
Ravi Chirania
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16872] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 601/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 492/2022 Ramesh Chand Gupta S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village Sainthal, Tehsil And District Dausa, Presently Residing At H.N. 108, Sector 11 Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Nathmal Didel, M.D. R.S.R.T.C. Head Quarter Parivahan Marg, Choumu House Jaipur.
2. Ramgopal Pareek, Finance Adviser, R.S.R.T.C. Head Quarter Parivahan Marg, Choumu House Jaipur.
3. Bhanwar Ali, Chief Manager, R.S.R.T.C. Central Bus Stand Sindhi Camp Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma for Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 21/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed the instant contempt petition alleging non-compliance of the order dated 19.01.2023, passed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court, by which the respondents were
directed to make the complete payment of due retiral benefits along with interest.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents-contemnors submits that the principal amount was paid long back, however, the interest part was due, and the same has also been paid in terms
[2026:RJ-JP:16872] (2 of 2) [CCP-601/2023] of the last order of this Court dated 13.04.2026 by which the respondents have now paid a sum of Rs. 2,34,000/- to the petitioner and the petitioner admits that he has received the same amount.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after this, only a certain amount against Government Holidays and DA is still pending and respondents have not yet made payment against the same.
4. Considering the fact that the substantial compliance has been made, however, it is stated that respondents-contemnors would also take the necessary steps for payment of the amount under the two heads within a reasonable time.
5. In view of the above, this contempt petition is disposed of.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J PARSHANT /35