Akhila Bharateeya Brahmana Karivena Nityaannadana Satram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/41888/2018 · 2026-02-25
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28428 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28428 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010837422018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No: 41888/2018 Between:
1. AKHILA BHARATEEYA BRAHMANA KARIVENA NITYAANNADANA SATRAM, H.O. SRISAILAM KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT C. TYAGARAJA SHARMA, S/O ESWARA SARMA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 49 AND 50, SHIVA SHAKTHI NILAYAM, NEAR GRAMPANCHAYAT OFFICE, CHENGICHERLA VILLAGE, GHATKESAR MANDAL, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPT. INTERIM SECRETARIAT, AMARAWATI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRISAILAM POLICE STATION KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. N VENUGOPAL, S/O N. MADHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. CO-OPTED GENARAL SECRETARY R/O DOOR NO.43-35, SECOND LANE, N.R.PETA KURNOOL.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT RAO PATIL
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. H SRINIVASA RAO AND VIJAYALAKSHMI The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.41888 OF 2018
ORDER:
No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner.
2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the matter is of civil in nature. Therefore, petitioner was informed to approach proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law.
3. It appears that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 26.02.2026
PSK
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
93
WRIT PETITION No:41888 OF 2018
Date: 26.02.2026
W PSK