Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5856 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.
3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/Room No.5, Prayagraj to decide the case bearing application 6C Under Order 39 Rule 1, 2 read with section 151 C.P.C. arising out of Original Suit No. 696 of 2025 (Arvind Mohan Gaur Vs. Sant Lal Yadav and others) pending before Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/ Room No. 05, Prayagraj since 27.08.2025, within a stipulated period.
4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.
5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/Room No.5, Prayagraj to decide the case bearing application 6C Under Order 39 Rule 1, 2 read with section 151 C.P.C. arising out of Original Suit No. 696 of 2025 (Arvind Mohan Gaur Vs. Sant Lal Yadav and others), expeditiously, preferably within eight months, strictly in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment. May 6, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Dwivedi, Vinod Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Arvind Mohan Gaur .....Petitioner(s) Sant Lal Yadav And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad