Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28414 (AP)

Matham Ratna Bai v. Smt V. Usha Rani

CC/1884/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010778812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1884/2013 Between: 1.MATHAM RATNA BAI,, D/O JEEVA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, WORKING FROM SEPTMBER, 2011 ONWARDS AS TEACHER(TELUGU), PRESENTLY WORKING KASTURBA GANDHI BALLKALA VIDYALAYAM, RAMPACHODAVARAM, R/O BORANAGUDEM COLONY, MUSURAMALLI POST, RAMAPCHODAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.R.LAKSHMI KANTHA, D/O DANIAL RAJU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, HINDU, WORKING FROM SEPTMBER, 2011 ONWARDS AS TEACHER(ENGLISH), PRESENTLY WORKING KASTURBA GANDHI BALLKALA VIDYALAYAM, RAMPACHODAVARAM RIO ADDATEEGALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3.T. PAPAYYAMMA,, D/O LAKSHMANAMRNA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, HINDU, WORKING FROM SEPTMBER, 2011 ONWARDS AS TEACHER(HINDI), PRESENTLY WORKING KASTURBA GANDHI BALLKALA VIDYALAYAM, MAREDURNILLI KAKAWADA VILLAGE, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.SMT V USHA RANI, THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE RAJIV VIDYA MISSION(SSA), SIEMAT, BUILDING IN THE PRMISES OF SCERT, B-BLOCK, OPP. LAL BAHADUR STADIUM, BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD-500 001. 2.V CHAKARDHAR RAO, THE PROJECT OFFICER, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYANA, BESIDES, DISTRICT LIBRARY, MAIN ROAD. KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/Contemnors and punish him for violating the Order dated 06-06-2013 passed by this Hon'bie Court in W.P. No. 15854 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 979 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to implement the order in W.P.No.15854 of 2 2013 dated 06-06-2013 by direct the respondents to continue the petitioners for respective posts and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2.VAKA KRANTHI SRI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.1884 of 2013 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.15854 of 2013 was disposed by this Court by an order dated 12.03.2026. In view of the said order, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:01.04.2026 KGM 4 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:1884 of 2013 Date: 01.04.2026 KGM