1 CGHC010449242019 2026:CGHC:31166 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 78 of 2020 Kalesh Ram Netam S/o Late Judawan Singh Netam Aged About 55 Years Working As Peon At Government Higher Secondary School, Atargaon, Block Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Division Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Development Department, Rajnandgoan, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Rajnandgoan, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 7 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Atargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K Agrawal (Order on Board) 22.07.2026 1. At the very outset, leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of grievance the petitioner may be allowed to make representation before the concerned respondents and same may be directed to be decided within a reasonable time. 2. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority for redressal of their grievance supported by relevant documents along with copy of this order within a period of 02 weeks from today, which, in turn, shall be considered and decided by the concerned respondent/competent authority within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of said representation in accordance with law by passing reasoned and speaking order. 3. With aforesaid observation, liberty and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition stands finally disposed off. 4. Accordingly, all the appears are dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Sanjay K Agrawal) Judge s@if