Undra Murali Krishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/38283/2018 · 2026-02-10
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28408 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28408 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010792842018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38283/2018 Between:
1. UNDRA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.MADAKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE,
GOPAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, GOPAVARAM, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering into the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of house site patta No.HS.1183/1989, dt.30-12- 1979 in Plot No.41 in Sy.No.802 /2 an extent of Ac.O-05 cents situated at Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without issuing any notice to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct 3rd Respondent not to interfere with petitioner peaceful possession and
2
enjoyment of house site patta No.HS.1183/1989, dt.30-12-1979 in Plot No.41 in Sy.No.802/2 an extent of Ac.0-05 cents situated at Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR Kadapa District during subsisting of petitioner patta, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to evict/dispossession of the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of house site patta No.HS.1183/ 1989, dt.30-12- 1979 in Plot No.41 in Sy.No.802 /2 an extent of Ac.0-05 cents situated at Madalcalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR Kadapa District during subsisting of petitioner patta, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T G PRASAD REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms. B. Sreeteja, learned counsel, representing Sri T.G. Prasad Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS
4
195
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 38283/2018
Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS