Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28403 (JHR)

SUDAMA RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1546/2025 · 2026-09-29

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29959 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1546 of 2025 -- 1. Sudama Ram, aged about 52 years, son of Late Ramdas Ram, resident of Village, P.O. & P.S.-Danda, District-Garhwa; 2. Ram Pravesh Kumar, aged about 38 years, son of Shree Asarfi Ram, resident of Village-Bishunpura, P.O.-Kochia, P.S.-Bisunpura, District-Garhwa 3. Bharat Sah, aged about 50 years, son of Late Fudani Sah, resident of Village-Sagma, P.O.-Katahar Kala, P.S.-Dhurki, District-Garhwa ...Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S.-Garhwa, District-Garhwa ...Opposite parties -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashim Kumar Sahani, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : A.C to S.C(Mines)-III -- 03/29.09.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the reasoned order has been passed; as such, he may be permitted to challenge the reasoned order. 2. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, no contempt is made out and the same is dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 29th September, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 08/10/2026