CRM-M-12571-2026 1 237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12571-2026 Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 VIPIN AND ORS. ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.407 dated 30.09.2017 registered under Sections 147, 148 323, 427 and 506 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Bilaspur, District Gurugram Annexure P-1) on the basis of compromise dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. On the previous date of hearing, following order has been passed. “The parties and Investigating Officer are directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court on the date fixed or any other future date as per its convenience or on request of the parties for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise. However, it is made clear that no adjournment beyond the date fixed by this Court i.e. 11.05.2026 shall be granted to the parties for that purpose. The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court shall submit the report on or before the next date of hearing.” 3. Report dated 22.04.2026 has since been received from Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Pataudi, duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Gurugram, in pursuance to the directions of this Court. 4. Perusal of the report reveals that while the complainant (Raj Kumar) has appeared and supported the compromise, the injured/aggrieved KUMUD VERMA 2026.07.10 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-12571-2026 2 persons, namely, Parveen, Ravinder, Tarawati and Mahender, have neither appeared before the trial Court to make statements in support of the compromise nor are they parties to the present petition. In the absence of the consent of all the injured/aggrieved persons, the compromise cannot be treated as complete or voluntary so as to warrant the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. In view thereof, the present petition is dismissed. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 10.07.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.07.10 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh