Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28399 (AP)

Rapalli Tirupathi S/o Ankaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5668/2014 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.5668_2014 APHC010781892014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5668/2014 Between: 1. RAPALLI TIRUPATHI S/O ANKAIAH, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER SUSPENSION), NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, R/O H.NO.2/55, GANDIPALEM HARIJANAWADA, UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPTD. BY ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT PROGRAM COORDINATOR, NREGS, A.P., NELLORE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, NELLORE, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 HN, J W.P.No.5668_2014 pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings Notice No.Rc.No.E.5/195/FSO/2013, dated: 23.01.2014 terminating the petitioner fromthe post of Field Assistant as illegal, improper, unjust, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits including seniority, monitory etc., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 7048 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings Notice No.Rc.No.E.5/195/FSO/2013, dated: 23.01.2014 passed by the 3rd respondent by reinstating the petitioner into service as Field Assistant and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV 3 HN, J W.P.No.5668_2014 ORDER: 1. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the 3rd respondent. The said order also entitles the petitioner to file an appeal within the prescribed time. However, the petitioner has not availed the alternative effective remedy and has filed the present writ petition. 2. In view of the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this matter. 3. Accordingly this writ petition is closed There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.5668_2014 152 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5668 of 2014 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA