Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28398 (AP)

Boya Madhu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26692/2014 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.26692_2014 APHC010787152014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26692/2014 Between: 1. BOYA MADHU,, S/O. B. MADDILETI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O.H.NO.4-47, NANOOR VILLAGE, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT, A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (NREGS), KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, NANOOR GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NANOOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SARADA, D/O GIDDAIAH, AGED ABUOT 32 YEARS, OCC: STAFF NURSE, VISWABHARATHI CANCER HOSPITAL, K. NAGALAPURAM VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HN, J W.P.No.26692_2014 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the order vide Rc.No.57/HRM/2008, Dt.10.01.2014 issued by the 3rd respondent in terminating the petitioner without following any guidelines under GOMs.No.98, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (RD- II), Dt.09.03.2010 is illegal and arbitrary and set side the same and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant under NREGS in respect of Nanoor Gram Panchayat, Orvakal Mandal IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 33349 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant under NREGS in respect of Nanoor Village, Orvakal Mandal pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) 3 HN, J W.P.No.26692_2014 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings passed by the Project Director. As per the impugned proceedings, an appeal lies before the District Collector within the time specified therein. 2. However, the petitioner has approached this Court without filing an appeal before the appellate authority. 3. In view of the above, this Court finds no grounds to interfere in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.26692_2014 163 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26692 of 2014 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA