APHC010820912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39533/2018 Between: 1. GENUPULA ANKI REDDY, S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 40YRS R/O THUMMALAPALLI VILLAGE B.KONDURU MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TAHSILDAR, B.KONDURU MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the land extent Ac.0.80cts situated in Sy.No.271 of Thummalapalli village, B.Konduru mandal, Kadapa District and trying to allot the said land to 3rd parties as house site pattas without following due process of law and without acquiring the land as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the 2 possession of the petitioner over the land extent Ac.0.80cts situated in Sy.No.271 of Thummalapalli village, B.Konduru mandal, Kadapa District without following due process of law in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the land extent Ac.0.80cts situated in Sy.No.271 of Thummalapalli village, B.Konduru mandal, Kadapa District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri D. Kumar Naik, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS 4 207 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39533/2018 Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS