1 CGHC010196542025 2026:CGHC:31063 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 99 of 2025 Shyam Sundar Mahesh S/o Jahruram Mahesh Aged About 52 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Harita D/o Lt. Raghunath Chakardhari Aged About 43 Years R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Asha D/o Lt. Fagulal Chakradhari Aged About 45 Years R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Gopi D/o Lt. Fagulal Chakradhari Aged About 44 Years R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Rekha D/o Lt. Fagulal Chakradhari Aged About 42 Years R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Anita D/o Lt. Fagulal Chankradhari Aged About 40 Years R/o- Puchhapara, Kumharpara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Rajinder Singh Aajmani S/o Sant Singh As Aged About 68 Years Occupation Business, R/o Itwari Bazar, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant : Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Adv. on behafl of Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 5 : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondents No. 6 : Mr. Vikhyat Arora, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- {Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi} Order on Board 21/07/2026 Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 to 5 submits that Civil Suit No. A/17/2024 (Shyam Sundar Vs. Harita & others), in which, impugned order dated 09.04.2025 was passed by Principal District Judge, Raigarh (C.G.), has been dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 20.03.2026, as such, this appeal has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 has also filled certified copy of the order dated 20.03.2026 alongwith covering memo. 3. Counsel for the appellant also conceded the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of above, this misc. appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.07.23 17:54:25 +0530