IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48547 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-617 Year-2025 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Karu yadav Son of Ramkrit Yadav @ Ram krit Yadav Resident of Village- Kabirpur, Ps- Belaganj, Dist- Gaya 2. Mahendra Yadav Son of Ramkrit yadav @ Ram Krit Yadav Resident of Village- Kabirpur, Ps- Belaganj, Dist- Gaya 3. Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Yadav Son of Ramkrit Yadav @ Ram Krit yadav Resident of Village- Kabirpur, Ps- Belaganj, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS, 2023’) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners who apprehend arrest in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 617 of 2025, lodged on 24/10/2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48547 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 eight named accused persons including the present petitioners with allegation that they have caused injury by Lathi-Danda to the informant, his wife as well as other known persons, who came forward to save. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioners and informant, both are agnates and relating to construction of road, the said scuffling took place on the family members. Counsel submits that upon bare perusal of the FIR, there is nothing specific against anyone. However, a bare perusal of the FIR reveals that no specific overt act has been attributed to the petitioner, nor can it be ascertained from the FIR as to who caused the alleged grievous injury. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioners is clean and it is a family dispute which is unfortunately registered as Police Case. Counsel further submits that petitioners are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners but fairly submits that the petitioners and informant are agnates and it is a family dispute between the petitioners and informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48547 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 617 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. Mkr./Anshuman/ (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T