Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28387 (CAL)

ARCHITA MANNA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

FMA/1087/2022 · 2026-07-17

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 17.07.2026 (Naba) 21 F.M.A. 1087 of 2022 Smt. Archita Manna Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Chandreyi Alam, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Ravi Kumar Dubey ...for the State 1. None appears on behalf of the appellant. 2. State is represented. 3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion i.e. 10.07.2026, nobody was present to represent the appellant. 4. Apparently, the appellant has lost interest to proceed with the case. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. 6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)