Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28385 (AP)

M. Thulasiram v. The Joint Collector

WP/38254/2018 · 2026-02-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010791692018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38254/2018 Between: 1. M. THULASIRAM, S/O LATE M. SANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O THUMBAPALYAM VILLAGE AND POST, BANGARUPALYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 416. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGARUPALYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. - 517416. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing the Suspension Petition or Revision Petition filed by the petitioner on 14-05-2018 before the 1st respondent and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the suspension petition or revision petition filed by the petitioner on 14-05-2018 before the 1st respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to fix a day for hearing the suspension petition or revision petition filed by the petitioner on 14-05-2018 before the 1st respondent forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S VARADARAJULU CHETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS 193 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38254/2018 Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS