APHC010781542014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36976/2014 Between: 1. M.RAJASEKHAR,, S/O. GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O M.AGRAHARAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND THE MANAGER DIRECTOR, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent company in not appointing the petitioner on either contract basis or regular basis though the petitioner had worked for three years on contract basis in the respondent company as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminative and against statutory provisions and against Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the order passed by the 2nd respondent in his letter No.SE/O/TPT/PO/ADM/U3/D.No:1523/08 dated 23.10.2008 with further 2 direction to appoint the petitioner on contract basis as and when there is requirement and also on regular basis as per law IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 46263 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent company to appoint the petitioner on contract basis as and when there is requirement, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NEERAJ NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.03.2026 PNS