APHC010805992014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 41208 OF 2014 Between: 1. M.SRINIVAS,, S/O LATE M. ANAND MOHAN RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, WORKING AS JUNIOR ASSISTRANT IN SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, BATCHUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENTS, A.P. SECRETARIATE, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS STATE OF, ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, MULTI ZONE-I KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIE OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, BATCHUPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the impugned. Proceedings Rc.No.A3/3702/2014, dated: 24-122014 issued by the 3rd respondent and consequential orders in Rc.No. Nil/2014, Dated: 27-12-2014 issued by the 4th respondent herein without jurisdiction and in violation of pen frig abeyance orders dated: 27-5-2013, as illegal arbitrary discriminatory and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and set aside the same; consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the establishment of 4th respondent Temple, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 51591 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned Proceedings Rc.No.A3/3702/2014, dated: 24-12-2014 issued by the 3rd respondent and consequential orders in Rc.No. Ni1/2014, Dated: 27-12-2014 issued by the 4th respondent and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the eastablishnment of 4th respondent herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 41208 OF 2014 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 03.03.2026 BSK 85 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 41208 OF 2014 Date: 03.03.2026 BSK