APHC010787012015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 388/2015 Between: 1. GAJULAPALLI BALI REDDY,& 9, S/O BALI REDDY AGED 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURAL, HINDU VILLAGE : CHINTAPAUTHAYAPPLI , MANDAL BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2. KALUVA JAYARAMI REDDY, S/O RAMASWAMY REDDY AGE : 54 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, HINDU VILLAGE & MANDAL - BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3. GAJULAPALLI RAM SUBBAMMA, W/O RAM SUBBA REDDY AGED 56 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, VILLAGE & MANDAL BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. GAJULAPALLI VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O ROSI REDDY AGED 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, HINDU VILLAGE - GUNTHAPPALE MANDAL BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. KESAVA REDDY, S/O CHINNPOLI REDDY AGED 32 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, HINDU VILLAGE - PUTTAYAPPLI, MANDAL - BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 6. NAGI REDDY VENKATA SUBBAIH, S/O BALAYYA AGED 2 56 YEARS, HINDU, VILLAGE - PUTAYAPALLI, MANDAL - BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 7. KALLURU VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O RAM REDDY AGE 58 YEARS, HINDU VILLAGE - PUTTYAPALLI, MANDAL - BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 8. VENKALA PENCHAL REDDY, S/O NARSAIAH AGED : 42 HINDU, OCC : AGRICULTURE VILLAGE - GODUGUNURU, MANDAL - BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 9. VENKALA LAKSHMMA, W/O NARASSIAH AGED 62, HINDU, OCC : AGRICULTURE VILLAGE - GODUGUNURU MANDAL - BADVEL , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 10. BUMI REDDY SARASWATI, W/O JAYA SUBBA REDDY AGED : 39 YEARS, HINDU VILLAGE - CHINTALACHRUVU, MANDAL - BADVEL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP PRL SCY COOP HYD 4, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT ) SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, KADAPA KADAPA DISTRICT 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE CENTRE BANK KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 4. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, BRANCH AT BADVEL KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 3 5. THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, CHENNAKESAMPALLI REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHENNAKESAMPALLI VILLAGE, MANDAL - BADVEL KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ or writs more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmus declaring the proceedings Rc No Admn / Enquiry/D.W/ PACS/2014-15 dated 17-12-2014 of the 2nd respondent is illegal arbitrary and malafide of violation of the principal of natural justice and site a side the same in the interest of equity IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 475 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceeding No Rc.No.Admn/ Enquiry/D. W/PACS/2014- 15dated17.12.2014 of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the 2nd respondent in the interest of justice and equity pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH JANARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 3. S DUSHYANTH REDDY 4. CHALLA SIVASANKAR 4 The Court made the following: 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.388 of 2015 O R DE R: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the Office Order issued by Respondent No.2 vide Rc.No.Admn/Enquiry /D.W/PACS/2014-15 dated 17.12.2014 where under Sri P. V. Siva Prasad, Assistant General Manager was appointed as Enquiry Officer to conduct detailed enquiry regarding the complaints made by Smt. K. Vijayamma, Ex-MLA of Badvel against the Presidents of Chennakesampalli and Brahmanapalli PACS and others that they have taken loans fraudulently in the name of some farmers in Badvel area. Subsequently, this Court had issued Notice Before Admission on 20.01.2015 and no interim orders were passed by this Court at this length of time. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 would submit that no cause of action survives in the writ petition,in view of subsequent developments in this matter. 6 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to pursue the legal remedies as and when occasion arises. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 29.01.2026 chs 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 122 WRIT PETITION NO:388/2015 Dt. 29.01.2026 chs