Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28376 (AP)

D. Mamatha v. Sri B. Ramanjaneyulu

CC/1474/2015 · 2026-02-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010759462015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1474/2015 Between: 1. D. MAMATHA,, W/O. SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SENIOR MATE, 0/O. PENUMURU MANDAL, THIRIVIREDDY PALLE (GP) PENUMUR MANDAL & POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517 126. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B RAMANJANEYULU, DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER,MGNR (EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME) RURAL DEVELOPMENT & P. RAJ, HEMATAGE COMPLEX, BESIDE A.G. OFFICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI VENUGOPAL REDDY, PROJECT DIRECTOR/CEO, ZP, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SRI O SHIVA RAJU, MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PENUMUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents to appear before this Hon'ble Court and punish them suitably under Sections 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 19.06.2015 in WP.MP.No.23197/2015 in WP.No.17949/2015 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 7690 OF 2015 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1474/2015 ORDER:- The instant contempt case has been filed alleging the violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17949 of 2015, dated 19.06.2015. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, the learned Standing Counsel submits that the main writ petition vide W.P.No.17949 of 2015 was disposed of on 03.05.2023. Consequently, in terms of the Interim Order of this Court, the respondent authorities issued pay orders for payment of salary to the petitioner from 17.07.2014 to July, 2015 and the said amount was credited to the petitioner’s account on 09.09.2015 and the same was also acknowledged by the petitioner. 4. In nutshell, Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, the learned Standing Counsel submits that the respondents have complied with the Interim Order of this Court dated 19.06.2015. 5. In view of the above submissions, coupled with the specific averments made in paragraph No.4 of the counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent, 4 and considering that the main writ petition was disposed of on 03.05.2023, the present contempt case is closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.02.2026 SCH 5 280 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No.1474 of 2015 Date: 24.02.2026 SCH