2026:JHHC:29664 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8416 of 2026 Vikash Bhuiyan @ Vikash Kumar aged about 24 years, son of Dahan Bhuiyan @ Dahan Ram, Resident of Village- Dhengura, P.O.- Lilanagar, Marhand, P.S.- Katkamdag, Dist.- Hazaribag. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Informant/Victim … … Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP --- 04/05.10.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2026 in connection with S.T. No. 402 of 2026 arising out of Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 998 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 69/70(1)/62(2)(a)/126(2)/115(1)/351(2)/352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge- VI, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2026. The charge has been framed on 12.08.2026 for alleged offence under Section 69 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that the victim has also refused for her medical examination. He submits that the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 be perused, wherein she has stated that she is a married lady; her husband was working outside and was not sending money to her; she went with the petitioner to work in Delhi, stayed there for some time along with him and initially the petitioner used to send some money for her family, but subsequently stopped and he left. The victim has also alleged that the petitioner established physical relationship with her and ultimately, she returned back from Delhi. 5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 2026:JHHC:29664 2 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, wherein she has stated that she herself had gone with the petitioner to Delhi and also stayed there for quite some time with the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Hazaribag in connection with S.T. No. 402 of 2026 arising out of Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 998 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The petitioner shall not disturb the victim or her family members in any manner whatsoever. If any complaint of this nature is found, it will be open to the victim to move the learned court for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:05.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:06.10.2026