[2026:RJ-JP:9174] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6496/2023 1. Om Prakash Mahala S/o Shri Sultan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Near Bus Depo, Ward No. 27, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Sachin Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Vinod Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Stadium Ke Samne, Jaswant Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Rahul Nagar S/o Shri Muglesh Kumar Nagar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Naharganj Mohalla, Ward No. 09, Kumher, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 4. Javed Ali S/o Anwar Ali, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 07, Takia Ke Pass, Teh. Neem Ka Thana, Hasampur, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Ram Niwas S/o Shri Narayan Ram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 305, Beniwalon Ka Baas Purv, Manjhee, Distt. Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Special Secretary Cum Mission Director, Department Of Medical And Health, Directorate Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Nhm Hq, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun Mr. Harshi Kakani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “(i) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of petitioners for the post of CHO [2026:RJ-JP:9174] (2 of 3) [CW-6496/2023] under Sports Person Category on Contractual basis in pursuant to advertisement dated 31.08.2020. (ii) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of petitioners.” 2. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 3. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC as counsel for respondents. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the controversy raised herein is already settled by judgment of Division Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in DB Special Appeal Writ No. 111/2025 titled as Garvit Vyas Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided on 01.08.2025 and considered by this Court, therefore the writ petition be disposed of in light of judgment in case of Garvit Vyas Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 5. Learned counsel for respondent submits that subject to verification of veracity of facts as claimed by the petitioner, the writ petition be disposed of. 6. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in light of case of Garvit Vyas Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and judgment dated 15.12.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 234/2025 titled as Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr., thus respondents are directed to conduct an inquiry in relation to the certificates as submitted by petitioners as early as possible preferably within a period of 12 weeks from date of receipt [2026:RJ-JP:9174] (3 of 3) [CW-6496/2023] of copy of this order. If petitioner(s) are found to be an outstanding sports person then only candidature of petitioner(s) be strictly considered in accordance with merits for the category for which the petitioner(s) filed an application for appoimtment. 7. In case of deviation, the respondents are under an obligation to decide the issue with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days after concluding the inquiry. 8. With aforesaid, the writ petition along with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /448