Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2837 (JHR)

BRINGA ALIAS MD. MOKRAM RAJJA ALIAS MD. BIRANGA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2463/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9255 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2463 of 2026 --------- 1.Bringa @ Md. Mokram Rajja @ Md. Biranga, aged about 29 years, son of Ashraf Miya. 2.Md. Taiyab Mian @ Md. Taiyab @ Md. Taiyab Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Md. Ashim. Both residents of Village Dumraun, P.O. Dumran, P.S. Ichak, District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioners : Mr. AK. Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, APP ---------- 02/Dated: 1st April, 2026 1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 registered under Sections 191(1), 192, 190, 132, 196, 299, 293, 326(f), 326(g), 324(5), 125(a), 125(b), 61 of B.N.S, pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has been implicated in this case. Though the petitioners are named in the FIR amongst other 45 persons stating the petitioners to be part of mob, but there is general and vague allegations against the petitioners. 3. It has been submitted that the other co-accused persons, namely, Bulla Ajit @ Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar and Shiv 2026:JHHC:9255 Page | 2 Kumar Bulla @ Shiv Kumar have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3017 of 2025 vide order dated 16.04.2025. Likewise, other co- accused persons, namely, Sagar Kumar Rana @ Sagar @ Sagar Ran in B.A. No. 3736 of 2025 vide order dated 06.05.2025; Ashraf Mian @ Ashraf in B.A. No. 4269 of 2025 vide order dated 15.05.2025 have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioners falls on better footing. The petitioner no. 1 and 2 are in custody since 09.02.2026 and 13.02.2026 respectively. 4. Therefore, claiming the ground of parity, submission has been made that the present petitioners may also be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the opposite party-State although has seriously opposed the prayer for grant of bail but he has not disputed the fact of grant of bail in favour of the co-accused person. 6. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties. 7. This Court has taken into consideration the fact that the other co-accused persons, namely, other co-accused persons, namely, Bulla Ajit @ Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar and Shiv Kumar Bulla @ Shiv Kumar have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3017 of 2025 vide order dated 16.04.2025. Likewise, 2026:JHHC:9255 Page | 3 other co-accused persons, namely, Sagar Kumar Rana @ Sagar @ Sagar Ran in B.A. No. 3736 of 2025 vide order dated 06.05.2025; Ashraf Mian @ Ashraf in B.A. No. 4269 of 2025 vide order dated 15.05.2025 have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, which has not been disputed by learned APP appearing for the State and the allegation against the petitioners are general and omnibus, as such, considering the issue of parity, this Court is of the view that the present application deserves to be allowed. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. 9. In consequence thereof, the petitioners named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall not absent themselves on the date fixed without any cogent cause. In failure, the learned trial court shall have liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law so that the trial be not hindered. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 1st April, 2026 Alankar/-