MOHIT BAG @ THATO @ MOHIT BAGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9426/2026 · 2026-10-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28369 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28369 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:30179 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9426 of 2026
------ Mohit Bag @ Thato @ Mohit Bagh, aged about 23 years, s/o Late Dilip Bag, R/o H.No.1333, Home Pipe, Chayanagar, Sitaramdera, P.O. & P.S.-Sitaramdera, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 08-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No.39 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109(1), 332(b), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that no one has sustained bullet injury. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-18 of this bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2026 in B.A. No.8461 of 2026. It is next submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No.39 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/10/2026 Abhiraj/