Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35676 WP No. 15595 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 15595 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI MAHESH KUMAR S/O TIPPARAYA HIREY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT 3065 SWEETVIOLET DR, SAN RAMON CA 945 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR. AMARESH S/O SRI. HAMPAYYA SAHUKAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S SAI RAM INVESTMENTS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.200/174, NANDAGUDI TOWN HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS
1. SRI M. RAMAKRISHNA
2. SMT. RATHNAMMA.
2.
SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI PATIL W/O. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR PATIL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O. NO.G-2, 'SRI. SHANKARA MANSION' N-23, L.G. HALLI, DOLLARS COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560094.
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35676 WP No. 15595 of 2026
3.
SRI. DAVEEDA RAJ @ DAVID C S/O LATE. SRI. D. CHOWRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O. MARIYAM PALYA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560045.
4.
SMT. REENA LETHISIYA D/O SRI. DAVEEDA RAJ @ DAVID.C AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O. MARIYAM PALYA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560045.
5.
SRI. DENZI LAWRENCE D/O SRI. DAVEEDA RAJ @ DAVID.C AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O. MARIYAM PALYA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560045. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O/DATED 09.07.2026;
NOTICE TO R2 TO R5 ARE DISPENSED WITH V/O/DATED 09.07.2026)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.02.2025 ON I.A NO. 3/2025 IN O.S. NO. 260/2025 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35676 WP No. 15595 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.02.2025 in I.A.No.3/2025 in O.S.No.260/2025 passed by the XLI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, whereby the trial court has adjourned I.A.No.3/2025 till notices are issued to all the defendants.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, according to the petitioner, the violation is attributable to defendant No.1, who has already been served, and that the court ought to have passed an order on I.A.No.3.
3. Before this court, the petitioner has taken out hand summons on the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 before the trial Court and has filed a memo to that effect. For the other respondents, he has sought dispensation of notice and this Court, by order dated 09.07.2026, has dispensed notice to the other respondents. This Court considering the fact that I.A.No.3/2025 is filed and the violation that is alleged is
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35676 WP No. 15595 of 2026
restricted to defendant No.1/respondent No.1. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER i. The trial Court shall consider I.A.No.3/2025 as expeditiously as possible. ii. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. iii. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54