APHC010731822014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 8759/2014 Between: 1. THANGIRALA PRASADA RAO, S/O. LATE SIKHAMANI,, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 36-8-46, VENKATESWARAPURAM, NEHRU NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. SMT. K. VIJAYA, W/O. GANDI BABJI VARA PRASADA RAO,, R/O. DOOR NO. 9-13-45/2/2 CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER 3. SMT VAKA RUKHMINI DEVI W/O V V M V PRASADA RAO, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO. 39-33/98/3/1 KALINGA NAGAR, MADHAVADHARA HUDA COLONY VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, Orders or Directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not considering the representations dated 22.11.2013, 25.11.2013 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles, 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution 2 of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd respondent for making illegal construction of an extent of 355.5 sq. yards situated in Sy No. 19/7/A/B in Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapantam District IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 10942 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd respondent who is making illegal constructions of an extent of 355.5 sq. yards situated in Sy No. 19/7/A/B in Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapantam District by considering the representations dt. 22.11.2013 and 25.11.2013 of the petitioners, pending disposal of the main writ petition, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit to receive the counter affidavit by allowing the leave petition in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DEEPAK MISRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. G RAMA GOPAL 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: First listing of this Writ Petition was on 24.03.2014. Thereafter, after long gap, the matter was again listed on 17.03.2026. On the said date, there was no Representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. Having noted the same, this Court had directed the Registry to list this matter today under the caption ‘For dismissal’. Today also, even on second call, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 30.03.2026 Mnr 4 116 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 8759 OF 2014 Dt: 30.03.2026 Mnr