Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28366 (AP)

R.Appala Naidu v. Mr.M.V.Satyanarayana

CC/162/2013 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010786902013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 162/2013 Between: 1. R.APPALA NAIDU,, S/O.LATE VEERASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.46-22-22, DONDAPARTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR M V SATYANARAYANA, S/o. Ramaswamy, Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him for willfully disobeying the status quo orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No. 19821 of 2012 in W.P.No. 15386 of 2012, dated 23.05.2012 initially upto 13.06.2012 and which was subsequently extended by order dated 15.06.2012 until further orders under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts' Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 94 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent not to initiate any coercive steps as directed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No. 19821 of 2012 in W.P.No.15386 of 2012 2 dated 24.05.2012 while granting status quo up to 13.06.2012 and as extended until further orders by order dated 15.06.2012, pending disposal of the above Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. S LAKSHMI NARAYANA 2. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY 3. N RANGA REDDY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 162 OF 2013 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court dated 23.05.2012 in W.P.M.P.No.19821 of 2012 in W.P.No.15386 of 2012. 2. It transpires from the record that during the pendency of the Contempt Case, the main Writ Petition No.15386 of 2012 itself has been dismissed for non-prosecution, vide Order dated 13.09.2023, which is on record. The Final Order passed by the erstwhile High Court dated 13.09.2023 is taken on record. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the view that this Contempt Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 162 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr