M/s. Sriram Enterprises, Tobacco Dealers Gandhipet v. Tej Tobacco Traders, Chilakaluripet
AS/141/2015 · 2026-01-05
V Srinivas
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28363 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28363 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010775432015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 141/2015 Between:
1. M/S. SRIRAM ENTERPRISES, TOBACCO DEALERS GANDHIPET,, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. SRIRAM KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE VEEALAH, AGED 60 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MARTUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. TEJ TOBACCO TRADERS CHILAKALURIPET, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX, MRS. MADDI NIRMALA, W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO.
2. MRS MADDI NIRMALA PROPRIETRIX TEJ TO ACCO TRADERS, CHILAKALURIPET, W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, INDIAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
3. MADDI SESHAGIRI RAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, [GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY TO THE PROPRIETRIX, TEJ TOBACCO TRADERS, CHILAKALURIPET], INDIAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
THE 1ST DEFENDANT IS HAVING IT'S REGISTERED OFFICE AT CHILAKALURIPET AND THE 2ND AND 3RD DEFENDANTS ARE RESIDING OPPOSITE TO MODERN COLLEGE, BESIDE R.R. PUBLIC SCHOOL, NEAR OFFICER'S RECREATION CLUB, GANDHIPET, CHILAKALURIPET - 522 616.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO
2. E AJAY REDDY The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.141 of 2015
JUDGMENT:
This Appeal Suit is filed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 24.09.2014 passed in O.S.No.41 of 2009 on the file of the learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant filed a Memo along with letter dated 30.12.2025, stating that the matter is settled out of the Court and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. The Memo and letter are taken on record.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________
JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
Date:06.01.2026 KNN
4
1 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
APPEAL SUIT No.141 of 2015
(Withdrawn)
Date: 06.01.2026
KNN