Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28362 (CAL)

SUKUMAR MONDAL AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/921/2026 · 2026-07-15

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.07.2026 SL No. 936 Court No.35 Rohan IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 921 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of: Sukumar Mondal & Anr. …Petitioners Mr. Md. Golam Nure Imrohi Mr. Sabbir Biswas Mr. Partha Pratim Sinha Mr. Golam Sardar … for the Petitioners Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, APP Ms. Tanusree Kar …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners have been arrested. As such, he has instructions not to proceed with the anticipatory bail application. 2. Learned advocate for the State is present. 3. In view of the submissions advanced, C.R.M. (A) 921 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)